CORE–SoET represents a shift from examination-oriented education to a research-driven learning culture. By embedding structured research practices into undergraduate programs, it enhances:

  • Student competencies and employability
  • Faculty engagement in research mentoring
  • Institutional research output and innovation capacity

This positions the institution as a hub of academic excellence and technological innovation. 

1. Research Framework

The program follows a Three-Phase Research and Innovation Model:

Phase I: Research Foundation

  • Literature survey using recognized databases 
  • Research gap identification 
  • Problem statement formulation
  • Introduction to research ethics
  • Poster Presentation I (Evaluation) 

Outcome: Builds research literacy, critical thinking, and academic discipline.

Phase II: Research Development

  • Methodology design 
  • Model/algorithm/framework development 
  • Experimental or simulation validation 
  • Research writing workshops 
  • Poster Presentation II (Evaluation) 

Outcome: Strengthens analytical skills, problem-solving ability, and interdisciplinary collaboration.

Phase III: Innovation & Output 

  • Prototype development 
  • Research paper drafting and publication support 
  • Patent screening and IPR guidance 

Outcome: Translates ideas into tangible innovations, publications, and intellectual property. 

2. Mentorship Model

  • Each student team is guided by a doctoral-qualified faculty mentor 
  • Continuous support in technical, methodological, and ethical aspects 
  • Regular review meetings for progress tracking and refinement 

3. Student Team Formation

  • Two research teams per section 
  •  Each team comprises 4–5 students 
  • Encouragement of interdisciplinary collaboration 

4. Transparent Topic Allocation

  • Research topics are proposed by faculty members 
  • Mentor identities remain anonymous during selection to ensure fairness 
  • Mentor mapping is revealed after topic finalization  

5. Evaluation & Monitoring

  • Phase-wise poster presentations and reviews 
  • Assessment based on: 
  • Depth of research 
  • Clarity of problem and solution 
  • Innovation potential 
  • Practical applicability  
  • Continuous monitoring by the CORE Committee for quality assurance